<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic Lumix FX35 vs. Kodak v705</title>
	<atom:link href="http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/</link>
	<description>Better, Faster, Cheaper Real Estate Tours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RES</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>RES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s a great option. However, a new lumix is being released in September. If you can wait, I would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a great option. However, a new lumix is being released in September. If you can wait, I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eileen</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>jeff
are you still SOLD on the LUMIX if the Kodak V705 is not available or  $300+?  color is richer but i like that bit of a wider shot...thoughts here in July 2009? anything newer that has trumped these?
em.
shaker heights ohio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff<br />
are you still SOLD on the LUMIX if the Kodak V705 is not available or  $300+?  color is richer but i like that bit of a wider shot&#8230;thoughts here in July 2009? anything newer that has trumped these?<br />
em.<br />
shaker heights ohio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the great comparison. Im a full time resal estate investor buying and selling in Georgia and the camera often get the client to the door</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the great comparison. Im a full time resal estate investor buying and selling in Georgia and the camera often get the client to the door</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-6454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-6454</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never given this a try, but I think it&#039;s about time I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never given this a try, but I think it&#8217;s about time I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furmy</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Furmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-6059</guid>
		<description>Definately flash on dust - contacted Panasonic and they referred me to page 111 of FX35 User Manual. Took it back - so many indoor photos at children&#039;s party ruined totally by this crazy design defect - relates to focal length of lens and extreme wide angle. AVOID FX35. Wait for the FX150 - just out. 27mm rather than 25mm - may be better. Look forward to trying it out.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definately flash on dust &#8211; contacted Panasonic and they referred me to page 111 of FX35 User Manual. Took it back &#8211; so many indoor photos at children&#8217;s party ruined totally by this crazy design defect &#8211; relates to focal length of lens and extreme wide angle. AVOID FX35. Wait for the FX150 &#8211; just out. 27mm rather than 25mm &#8211; may be better. Look forward to trying it out&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-5930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-5930</guid>
		<description>Sounds great.  The Lumix will be my next camera.  The one I have now is so old, it&#039;ll be great.  However I can say my current camera still takes beautiful pictures, just kindof big. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great.  The Lumix will be my next camera.  The one I have now is so old, it&#8217;ll be great.  However I can say my current camera still takes beautiful pictures, just kindof big. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-5821</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-5821</guid>
		<description>Jeff - Just a quick note to say, I love how you tag your blogs.  I had an agent ask me for a camera recommendation.  It was so easy to find your camera post.  You are the man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; Just a quick note to say, I love how you tag your blogs.  I had an agent ask me for a camera recommendation.  It was so easy to find your camera post.  You are the man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank LL0SA- Va Broker FranklyRealty.com</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-5686</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank LL0SA- Va Broker FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-5686</guid>
		<description>Andy,
Good question, and it is VERY confusing. A Digital SLR like the D40 isn&#039;t &quot;full frame&quot; so that 18 is actually a 28! You have to spend $3,000 to get a full frame DSLR.

So just get the v570, I just posted on how to buy one. http://tinyurl.com/4pbzjb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,<br />
Good question, and it is VERY confusing. A Digital SLR like the D40 isn&#8217;t &#8220;full frame&#8221; so that 18 is actually a 28! You have to spend $3,000 to get a full frame DSLR.</p>
<p>So just get the v570, I just posted on how to buy one. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4pbzjb" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/4pbzjb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo sharing life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Example Of Photos Taken To Flickr Upload Ratio</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-5675</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo sharing life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Example Of Photos Taken To Flickr Upload Ratio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 15:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-5675</guid>
		<description>[...] image is an illustration of a typical photo day for me. I took my Lumix DMC-FX35 with me on a business meeting day in Santa Barbara and Woodland Hills. 134 photos made it back to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] image is an illustration of a typical photo day for me. I took my Lumix DMC-FX35 with me on a business meeting day in Santa Barbara and Woodland Hills. 134 photos made it back to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Norton</title>
		<link>http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/comment-page-1/#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 13:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I am considering the Nikon D40 digital slr which comes standard with an 18-55 mm zoom. Which begs the question...

To the untrained brain, looking at the millimeter numbers and nothing more, 18mm on the Nikon would appear to be wider than 23 mm on the Lumix.

Is the Nikon zoom in the 18mm to 23mm range as wide as, and wider, than the Lumix FX35?

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I am considering the Nikon D40 digital slr which comes standard with an 18-55 mm zoom. Which begs the question&#8230;</p>
<p>To the untrained brain, looking at the millimeter numbers and nothing more, 18mm on the Nikon would appear to be wider than 23 mm on the Lumix.</p>
<p>Is the Nikon zoom in the 18mm to 23mm range as wide as, and wider, than the Lumix FX35?</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
